Texio formaterer hver opgave i den citeringsstil, du vælger. Her er, hvordan hver understøttet stil ser ud — både inde i teksten og i referencelisten.
Eksemplerne nedenfor beskriver alle den samme kilde, så du kan sammenligne stilarterne direkte. Formateringseksempler vises på engelsk — den standard, stilguiderne selv bruger — uanset din opgaves sprog.
Eksempelkilde
Chen, Li & Okafor, Amara (2021). "Generative AI tools and academic self-efficacy among undergraduate students." Journal of Educational Technology, 14(3), 211-228. DOI: 10.1234/jet.2021.0142
Nuværende standard for samfundsvidenskab, psykologi og pædagogik.
In-text-citat
(Chen & Okafor, 2021)
Post i referencelisten
Chen, L., & Okafor, A. (2021). Generative AI tools and academic self-efficacy among undergraduate students. Journal of Educational Technology, 14(3), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1234/jet.2021.0142
Tidligere APA-udgave — stadig påkrævet af nogle afdelinger inden for samfundsvidenskab.
In-text-citat
(Chen & Okafor, 2021)
Post i referencelisten
Chen, L., & Okafor, A. (2021). Generative AI tools and academic self-efficacy among undergraduate students. Journal of Educational Technology, 14(3), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1234/jet.2021.0142
Humaniora — litteratur, sprog og kunst.
In-text-citat
(Chen and Okafor)
Post i referencelisten
Chen, Li, and Amara Okafor. “Generative AI Tools and Academic Self-Efficacy Among Undergraduate Students.” Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 14, no. 3, 2021, pp. 211–28, https://doi.org/10.1234/jet.2021.0142.
Samfundsvidenskab, naturvidenskab og historie (forfatter-år-form).
In-text-citat
(Chen and Okafor 2021)
Post i referencelisten
Chen, Li, and Amara Okafor. 2021. “Generative AI Tools and Academic Self-Efficacy Among Undergraduate Students.” Journal of Educational Technology 14 (3): 211–28. https://doi.org/10.1234/jet.2021.0142.
Udbredt generel stil — erhvervsliv og samfundsvidenskab.
In-text-citat
(Chen and Okafor, 2021)
Post i referencelisten
Chen, L. and Okafor, A. (2021) “Generative AI tools and academic self-efficacy among undergraduate students,” Journal of Educational Technology, 14(3), pp. 211–228. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1234/jet.2021.0142.
Sociologi — American Sociological Association-stil.
In-text-citat
(Chen and Okafor 2021)
Post i referencelisten
Chen, Li, and Amara Okafor. 2021. “Generative AI Tools and Academic Self-Efficacy Among Undergraduate Students.” Journal of Educational Technology 14(3):211–28. doi:10.1234/jet.2021.0142.
Statskundskab — American Political Science Association-stil.
In-text-citat
(Chen and Okafor 2021)
Post i referencelisten
Chen, Li, and Amara Okafor. 2021. “Generative AI Tools and Academic Self-Efficacy Among Undergraduate Students.” Journal of Educational Technology 14(3): 211–28. doi:10.1234/jet.2021.0142.
Elektroteknik, datalogi og teknologi.
In-text-citat
[1]
Post i referencelisten
[1] L. Chen and A. Okafor, “Generative AI tools and academic self-efficacy among undergraduate students,” Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 211–228, 2021, doi: 10.1234/jet.2021.0142.
Medicin, biomedicinske og kliniske videnskaber.
In-text-citat
(1)
Post i referencelisten
1. Chen L, Okafor A. Generative AI tools and academic self-efficacy among undergraduate students. Journal of Educational Technology. 2021;14(3):211–28. doi:10.1234/jet.2021.0142
Ingeniørvidenskab og naturvidenskab — generiske nummererede referencer.
In-text-citat
[1]
Post i referencelisten
[1] L. Chen and A. Okafor, “Generative AI tools and academic self-efficacy among undergraduate students,” Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 211–228, 2021, doi: 10.1234/jet.2021.0142.
Medicinsk forskning — American Medical Association-stil.
In-text-citat
[1]
Post i referencelisten
1. Chen L, Okafor A. Generative AI tools and academic self-efficacy among undergraduate students. Journal of Educational Technology. 2021;14(3):211-228. doi:10.1234/jet.2021.0142
Biomedicinske og biovidenskabelige fag — National Library of Medicine-stil.
In-text-citat
[1]
Post i referencelisten
[1] Chen L, Okafor A. Generative AI tools and academic self-efficacy among undergraduate students. Journal of Educational Technology. 2021;14(3):211–228.
Naturvidenskab — Nature-tidsskriftets nummererede stil.
In-text-citat
[1]
Post i referencelisten
1. Chen, L. & Okafor, A. Generative AI tools and academic self-efficacy among undergraduate students. Journal of Educational Technology 14, 211–228 (2021).
The styles above are the ones most departments ask for, so they are one click away in Step 1. Behind them Texio supports 2311 citation styles in total — every independent style published by the Citation Style Language project that our renderer has verified against a real reference list. Search by journal or style name in the order form and pick any of them.
Styles that place citations in footnotes rather than in the text are not offered, because Texio renders citations inline. If the style your department requires is missing, tell us and we will look at adding it.
Citation styles come from the Citation Style Language project and are used under CC BY-SA 3.0