Texio memformat setiap kertas kerja mengikut gaya sitasi yang anda pilih. Berikut adalah rupa setiap gaya yang disokong — baik di dalam teks mahupun dalam senarai rujukan.
Semua contoh di bawah menerangkan sumber yang sama, jadi anda boleh membandingkan gaya secara langsung. Contoh pemformatan ditunjukkan dalam bahasa Inggeris — piawaian yang digunakan oleh panduan gaya itu sendiri — tanpa mengira bahasa kertas kerja anda.
Sumber contoh
Chen, Li & Okafor, Amara (2021). "Generative AI tools and academic self-efficacy among undergraduate students." Journal of Educational Technology, 14(3), 211-228. DOI: 10.1234/jet.2021.0142
Piawaian semasa untuk sains sosial, psikologi dan pendidikan.
Sitasi dalam teks
(Chen & Okafor, 2021)
Entri senarai rujukan
Chen, L., & Okafor, A. (2021). Generative AI tools and academic self-efficacy among undergraduate students. Journal of Educational Technology, 14(3), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1234/jet.2021.0142
Edisi APA terdahulu — masih diperlukan oleh sesetengah jabatan dalam sains sosial.
Sitasi dalam teks
(Chen & Okafor, 2021)
Entri senarai rujukan
Chen, L., & Okafor, A. (2021). Generative AI tools and academic self-efficacy among undergraduate students. Journal of Educational Technology, 14(3), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1234/jet.2021.0142
Kemanusiaan — sastera, bahasa dan seni.
Sitasi dalam teks
(Chen and Okafor)
Entri senarai rujukan
Chen, Li, and Amara Okafor. “Generative AI Tools and Academic Self-Efficacy Among Undergraduate Students.” Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 14, no. 3, 2021, pp. 211–28, https://doi.org/10.1234/jet.2021.0142.
Sains sosial, sains semula jadi dan sejarah (format pengarang–tarikh).
Sitasi dalam teks
(Chen and Okafor 2021)
Entri senarai rujukan
Chen, Li, and Amara Okafor. 2021. “Generative AI Tools and Academic Self-Efficacy Among Undergraduate Students.” Journal of Educational Technology 14 (3): 211–28. https://doi.org/10.1234/jet.2021.0142.
Gaya umum yang diajar secara meluas — perniagaan dan sains sosial.
Sitasi dalam teks
(Chen and Okafor, 2021)
Entri senarai rujukan
Chen, L. and Okafor, A. (2021) “Generative AI tools and academic self-efficacy among undergraduate students,” Journal of Educational Technology, 14(3), pp. 211–228. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1234/jet.2021.0142.
Sosiologi — gaya American Sociological Association.
Sitasi dalam teks
(Chen and Okafor 2021)
Entri senarai rujukan
Chen, Li, and Amara Okafor. 2021. “Generative AI Tools and Academic Self-Efficacy Among Undergraduate Students.” Journal of Educational Technology 14(3):211–28. doi:10.1234/jet.2021.0142.
Sains politik — gaya American Political Science Association.
Sitasi dalam teks
(Chen and Okafor 2021)
Entri senarai rujukan
Chen, Li, and Amara Okafor. 2021. “Generative AI Tools and Academic Self-Efficacy Among Undergraduate Students.” Journal of Educational Technology 14(3): 211–28. doi:10.1234/jet.2021.0142.
Kejuruteraan elektrik, sains komputer dan teknologi.
Sitasi dalam teks
[1]
Entri senarai rujukan
[1] L. Chen and A. Okafor, “Generative AI tools and academic self-efficacy among undergraduate students,” Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 211–228, 2021, doi: 10.1234/jet.2021.0142.
Perubatan, sains bioperubatan dan klinikal.
Sitasi dalam teks
(1)
Entri senarai rujukan
1. Chen L, Okafor A. Generative AI tools and academic self-efficacy among undergraduate students. Journal of Educational Technology. 2021;14(3):211–28. doi:10.1234/jet.2021.0142
Kejuruteraan dan sains semula jadi — rujukan bernombor generik.
Sitasi dalam teks
[1]
Entri senarai rujukan
[1] L. Chen and A. Okafor, “Generative AI tools and academic self-efficacy among undergraduate students,” Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 211–228, 2021, doi: 10.1234/jet.2021.0142.
Penyelidikan perubatan — gaya American Medical Association.
Sitasi dalam teks
[1]
Entri senarai rujukan
1. Chen L, Okafor A. Generative AI tools and academic self-efficacy among undergraduate students. Journal of Educational Technology. 2021;14(3):211-228. doi:10.1234/jet.2021.0142
Sains bioperubatan dan hayat — gaya National Library of Medicine.
Sitasi dalam teks
[1]
Entri senarai rujukan
[1] Chen L, Okafor A. Generative AI tools and academic self-efficacy among undergraduate students. Journal of Educational Technology. 2021;14(3):211–228.
Sains semula jadi — gaya bernombor jurnal Nature.
Sitasi dalam teks
[1]
Entri senarai rujukan
1. Chen, L. & Okafor, A. Generative AI tools and academic self-efficacy among undergraduate students. Journal of Educational Technology 14, 211–228 (2021).
The styles above are the ones most departments ask for, so they are one click away in Step 1. Behind them Texio supports 2311 citation styles in total — every independent style published by the Citation Style Language project that our renderer has verified against a real reference list. Search by journal or style name in the order form and pick any of them.
Styles that place citations in footnotes rather than in the text are not offered, because Texio renders citations inline. If the style your department requires is missing, tell us and we will look at adding it.
Citation styles come from the Citation Style Language project and are used under CC BY-SA 3.0