Texio formatteert elke paper in de citatiestijl die u kiest. Hier ziet u hoe elke ondersteunde stijl eruitziet — zowel binnen de tekst als in de referentielijst.
De onderstaande voorbeelden beschrijven allemaal dezelfde bron, zodat u de stijlen direct kunt vergelijken. Opmaakvoorbeelden worden in het Engels getoond — de standaard die de stijlgidsen zelf gebruiken — ongeacht de taal van uw paper.
Voorbeeldbron
Chen, Li & Okafor, Amara (2021). "Generative AI tools and academic self-efficacy among undergraduate students." Journal of Educational Technology, 14(3), 211-228. DOI: 10.1234/jet.2021.0142
Huidige standaard voor sociale wetenschappen, psychologie en onderwijs.
Citatie in de tekst
(Chen & Okafor, 2021)
Vermelding in de referentielijst
Chen, L., & Okafor, A. (2021). Generative AI tools and academic self-efficacy among undergraduate students. Journal of Educational Technology, 14(3), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1234/jet.2021.0142
Eerdere APA-editie — nog steeds vereist door sommige afdelingen in de sociale wetenschappen.
Citatie in de tekst
(Chen & Okafor, 2021)
Vermelding in de referentielijst
Chen, L., & Okafor, A. (2021). Generative AI tools and academic self-efficacy among undergraduate students. Journal of Educational Technology, 14(3), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1234/jet.2021.0142
Geesteswetenschappen — literatuur, talen en kunsten.
Citatie in de tekst
(Chen and Okafor)
Vermelding in de referentielijst
Chen, Li, and Amara Okafor. “Generative AI Tools and Academic Self-Efficacy Among Undergraduate Students.” Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 14, no. 3, 2021, pp. 211–28, https://doi.org/10.1234/jet.2021.0142.
Sociale wetenschappen, natuurwetenschappen en geschiedenis (auteur-datum-vorm).
Citatie in de tekst
(Chen and Okafor 2021)
Vermelding in de referentielijst
Chen, Li, and Amara Okafor. 2021. “Generative AI Tools and Academic Self-Efficacy Among Undergraduate Students.” Journal of Educational Technology 14 (3): 211–28. https://doi.org/10.1234/jet.2021.0142.
Veelgebruikte algemene stijl — bedrijfskunde en sociale wetenschappen.
Citatie in de tekst
(Chen and Okafor, 2021)
Vermelding in de referentielijst
Chen, L. and Okafor, A. (2021) “Generative AI tools and academic self-efficacy among undergraduate students,” Journal of Educational Technology, 14(3), pp. 211–228. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1234/jet.2021.0142.
Sociologie — stijl van de American Sociological Association.
Citatie in de tekst
(Chen and Okafor 2021)
Vermelding in de referentielijst
Chen, Li, and Amara Okafor. 2021. “Generative AI Tools and Academic Self-Efficacy Among Undergraduate Students.” Journal of Educational Technology 14(3):211–28. doi:10.1234/jet.2021.0142.
Politieke wetenschappen — stijl van de American Political Science Association.
Citatie in de tekst
(Chen and Okafor 2021)
Vermelding in de referentielijst
Chen, Li, and Amara Okafor. 2021. “Generative AI Tools and Academic Self-Efficacy Among Undergraduate Students.” Journal of Educational Technology 14(3): 211–28. doi:10.1234/jet.2021.0142.
Elektrotechniek, informatica en technologie.
Citatie in de tekst
[1]
Vermelding in de referentielijst
[1] L. Chen and A. Okafor, “Generative AI tools and academic self-efficacy among undergraduate students,” Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 211–228, 2021, doi: 10.1234/jet.2021.0142.
Geneeskunde, biomedische en klinische wetenschappen.
Citatie in de tekst
(1)
Vermelding in de referentielijst
1. Chen L, Okafor A. Generative AI tools and academic self-efficacy among undergraduate students. Journal of Educational Technology. 2021;14(3):211–28. doi:10.1234/jet.2021.0142
Ingenieurswetenschappen en natuurwetenschappen — algemene genummerde referenties.
Citatie in de tekst
[1]
Vermelding in de referentielijst
[1] L. Chen and A. Okafor, “Generative AI tools and academic self-efficacy among undergraduate students,” Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 211–228, 2021, doi: 10.1234/jet.2021.0142.
Medisch onderzoek — stijl van de American Medical Association.
Citatie in de tekst
[1]
Vermelding in de referentielijst
1. Chen L, Okafor A. Generative AI tools and academic self-efficacy among undergraduate students. Journal of Educational Technology. 2021;14(3):211-228. doi:10.1234/jet.2021.0142
Biomedische en levenswetenschappen — stijl van de National Library of Medicine.
Citatie in de tekst
[1]
Vermelding in de referentielijst
[1] Chen L, Okafor A. Generative AI tools and academic self-efficacy among undergraduate students. Journal of Educational Technology. 2021;14(3):211–228.
Natuurwetenschappen — genummerde stijl van het tijdschrift Nature.
Citatie in de tekst
[1]
Vermelding in de referentielijst
1. Chen, L. & Okafor, A. Generative AI tools and academic self-efficacy among undergraduate students. Journal of Educational Technology 14, 211–228 (2021).
The styles above are the ones most departments ask for, so they are one click away in Step 1. Behind them Texio supports 2311 citation styles in total — every independent style published by the Citation Style Language project that our renderer has verified against a real reference list. Search by journal or style name in the order form and pick any of them.
Styles that place citations in footnotes rather than in the text are not offered, because Texio renders citations inline. If the style your department requires is missing, tell us and we will look at adding it.
Citation styles come from the Citation Style Language project and are used under CC BY-SA 3.0